Brazilian court suspends operating license for Belo Monte dam

Construction of the contentious Amazon dam is complete, but a judge now says it can’t begin operating until commitments made to Indigenous groups back in 2010 are met.

The gigantic Belo Monte hydroelectric dam, located on the Xingu River in the heart of the Brazilian Amazon, stood just weeks away from beginning operation this week — but the controversial mega-dam, the third largest on earth, has now been blocked from generating electricity by the Brazilian court system until its builders and the government meet previous commitments made to the region’s indigenous people.

Federal court judge Maria Carolina Valente do Carmo in the city of Altamira, in the state of Pará where the dam is located, has suspended the dam’s operating license. It will not be reinstated, she decided, until the dam’s owner Norte Energia SA, along with Brazil’s government, meet a 2014 court-ordered licensing requirement to reorganize the regional office of Funai, the national agency that protects Brazil’s indigenous groups.

Judge Valente do Carmo has fined the government and company R$900,000 (US$225,000) for non-compliance with the Funai requirement, a provision included in the rules governing Belo Monte when the project was given its preliminary license in 2010.

This is the latest in a series of snafus that have plagued the dam’s construction. Licensing of the project was delayed last September by Brazil’s environmental agency IBAMA, due to a failure to complete agreed to provisions to mitigate the impacts of inundating thousands of acres of Amazon rain forest — flooding that could displace 20,000 people.

In December, Brazil’s Public Federal Ministry, an independent state body started legal proceedings to have it recognized that the crime of “ethnocide” was committed against seven indigenous groups during the building of the Belo Monte dam.

Earlier in 2015, federal prosecutors found that Norte Energia violated 55 different obligations it had agreed to in order to guarantee the survival of indigenous groups, farmers and fishermen whose homes and lands will be lost.

Indigenous groups have fought the dam since its inception, saying that it will severely impair their water supply and impact fishing and hunting. They especially contend that it will reduce the river’s flow by 80 percent at the Volta Grande (“Big Bend”), where indigenous Juruna and Arara people and sixteen other ethnic groups live, according to the teleSUR television network.

Plans to dam the Xingu River, one of the last major free flowing Amazon tributaries, go back almost a half century. In the 1970s, Brazil’s military dictatorship proposed several dams on the river, but was forced to withdraw in the face of indigenous opposition. In 1989, the civilian government made another attempt, but resistance again proved too strong. In 2010, the government put the project back on the table for a third time, but in a scaled down version that moved ahead despite continued strife. The dam gained international attention when British pop star Sting joined with indigenous chief Raoni Metuktire in campaigning against the dam.

In September 2015, federal officials leading up the Lava Jato (Car Wash) corruption investigation that has shaken Brazil and threatened the presidency of Dilma Rousseff, announced it would be concentrating corruption inquiries on the Belo Monte dam, because it is the country’s largest national hydroelectric power station. The dam’s budget, originally set at R$19 billion (US$5 billion), increased to R$33 billion (US$8.75 billion) due to cost overruns, with much of the bill footed by taxpayers.

With billions invested, and the dam already completed, most critics agree that the court’s current revocation of the operating license will be temporary. However, scientists recently reported that Belo Monte may never fulfill its promised electrical generating capacity. A scientific assessment released at the end of 2015 found that the flow of the Xingu River, which will feed the huge hydroelectric project, could fall by 25% to 55% by 2040 due to escalating drought brought by climate change.

This article was first published at Mongabay. It has been re-published by STOPGETrees.org under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) license.

Share This